Now, I applaud your somewhat humorous subject line, but beyond that the good points of your rant/hatemail are limited. I'll go through the points that were made, and if I can't respond to them, you win. If you win? Nothing happens, because as you've stated, you probably won't be able to sway me.

1. For example, when I argue something i might actually know a bit about it before i say something that isnt actually true at all.

This is a major flaw in your argument. You state that I don't know about what I rant about, and that I make untrue statements, yet you leave no reference as to where these flaws can be found. Ignoring that, while none of my rants are researched, I do know quite a bit about each topic, as they are the things in life that anger me/interest me.

2. you rant on topics which most poeple have either no opinion of, havent thought about  before, or already agree with.

My rants do not cater to most people. They are about what I hate, what I am interested in, or what I would abolish given the chance. Therefore, it doesn't matter if the people reading it lack an opinion, don't care, or agree with me, because either way, it states my opinion, which is what a rant is about.

3. I bet most people who read and agreed with your arguments probably didnt attempt at all to better the situation

Again, the rants are about my opinions, they are not an attempt to fix the world. The world is full of morons, and that will never change. There will always be men wearing makeup (faggots), there will always be misused words, and there will always be morons who think that they can change my opinion.

4. ranting only works if nobody really cares or everyone already agrees

Ranting does not serve a purpose to the general public, but to the ranter and any who enjoy reading the writings of an angry asshole. Agreeing has nothing to do with it, as I stated in my friend Holly's rant, which I disagree with but still find to be exceedingly awesome.

5. ranting really doesnt make people change their actions

Oh shit, I'm defeated. Oh wait, this is the same point as number 3. Dumbass.

6. while the people most likely still do all such stupid things and dont change their actions they probably have the nerve to judge others from that point on when people do dumb things. So, 3: ranting gives people to right to hypocracy.

People judge people anyway. That's not going to change. I judge fat chicks harsher than any other girls, no matter how good a personality they have, no matter how smart they are. They're still fat. At one point I was fat. I still made the same judgments. I had never read a rant site, yet I was still committing hypocrisy. Ranting does not give people the right to hypocrisy, the laws give people the right to hypocrisy.

7. now, i have to go because i have a life, which clearly you dont because you have
time to write all of these rantings which are clearly useless to society.

Damn, an insult at my lack of life. I guess you've beaten me. Except, you know, for the fact that you took the time to write me an email that's longer than most of my rants. I won't mention that you still managed to mess up the spelling, because that would be obvious to any of my (3) intelligent readers. There's also the fact that (before I continue, to all the readers, let me add that I know this girl. I won't give any details, you can find them yourselves if you want) I frequently have girlfriends ( something that say, a fat person couldn't do) , when I don't I mess around with other girls, I'm currently learning 4 instruments, and on top of that I have a job. This gives me very little time to be ranting, which would explain why my rants are so short.

In short, your entire theory has just been blown to pieces, probably due to the fact that they were written by somebody with absolutely no talent.

Good night, and have a pleasant tommorow.